|
An Analysis of Network Learning Project, Physics Park by Kery Strysick, University of Illinois 490NET |
||||||||||||
|
|
Introduction Network Learning Project, Physics Park, was originally designed by Denise Ciotti, physics teacher at Winsor School for Girls in Boston, and is a collaborative online project set up in a series of seven activities. The project is advertised on Global Schoolhouse and can be found at http://www.onlineclass.com/physics/home.html. The purpose of my project, An Analysis of Network Learning Project, Physics Park was to conduct an analysis of the effectiveness and organization of the Ciotti’s project. Teachers and students who had participated in the Physics Park network learning project completed the analysis. To analyze the effectiveness of Physics Park students participated in activities that explored physics concepts, practiced math problems, and guided them in designing a roller coaster. The lessons were presented in a private web classroom and assistance was provided through email discussions among the Physics Park project coordinator and participating students of classrooms worldwide. After completing the project students provided feedback in the following areas:
Participating teachers compared Physics Park’s organization to network learning project recommendations made in an article written by Michael Waugh, James Levin, and Kathleen Smith published in the February and March issues of The Computing Teacher Journal of 1994 entitled “Organizing Electronic Network-Based Instructional Interactions: Successful Strategies and Tactics.” This article described six organizational elements that were common in facilitating and completing successful network based projects: proposal, refinement, organization, pursuit, wrap-up, and publication. To begin this analysis project, I wrote a project proposal and distributed it to perspective participants. The proposal was also advertised on Global School Network and Collaborative Learning Environment Online (CLEO). Strong consideration was given to opening this project to a broad group. However, since this was the first time I was administering a project I decided to only involve local students and teachers. As I received registrations to participate in The Analysis of Network Learning Project, Physics Park I sent participants a specific timeline to follow and a list of things to consider throughout participation in the project. During the project I communicated with participants via email to check their progress. The analysis project was conducted over a three week time frame. As ten local students ranging in ages from 13 to 16 participated in Physics Park, myself and two other teachers monitored and evaluated project organization and effectiveness. |