| Goals |
| The Teachers's Technology Survey Project
was designed for a course on Learning Networks through the CTER Program at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The goals of this project were as follows:
|
| Materials |
| Very
few materials were needed for this project. The main tool used
was SurveyMonkey, an online
application that allows users to create their own web based
surveys. A basic account (quite sufficient for this project) is
free and allows users to publish surveys online and view
responses. The actual survey created for this project can be
accessed here. In addition, Microsoft Excel, Google Maps, and SeaMonkey Composer were used in the analysis and presentation of the results. |
| Procedure |
The
survey was created, as outlined above, and questions regarding the
following topics were formulated:
The Teachers' Technology Survey is a project
geared toward
teachers of all subjects and age groups. It
was designed for a masters level course
(Networks for Learning) through the The survey will be redistributed in September 2007 to the teachers at my school. |
| Results
and Reflection |
| The
overall success of this project was measured by the number of
participants
and the quality of their responses (i.e. whether or not they completed
the survey thoughtfully). The Teachers' Technology Survey was a huge success. Within the fifteen day period, 44 participants began the survey, and 41 surveys were thoughtfully completed. Three responses were deleted due to insufficient information. I was also pleased with the quality of responses. The survey contained several open ended questions with invitations for teachers to give suggestions for professional development and to describe an ideal technology support system within a school. These questions were answered thoughtfully and honestly and supplied, perhaps, some of the most valuable information collected. Several factors contributed to this high level of success including:
If I were to repeat this project with unknown participants, I would change several of my question wordings and formats to get more meaningful information. I would also try to find participants to help create questions rather than authoring them individually. Because it was solely up to me to decide which technologies to include, the survey is limited to my knowledge and experience. The original audience for this project was the set of teachers at my new school. Hoping to better serve them this fall, I wanted to collect information that would allow me to make considerate, informed decisions and be a better resource for the school. For comparison, and to fit the parameters of the project, I opened the project to a much broader audience, seeking participants from various online locations. Eventually, this took over the project and made the Teachers' Technology Survey an incredible learning experience. Early on, the decision was made to hold off on distributing the survey to my new colleagues until September 2007. This is largely the result of the overwhelming number of responses I received through the online announcements. Having completed a simple analysis of the data collected, I now have the comparison group I was seeking at the outset of the project. I am looking forward to running the survey again and comparing the results as I prepare for the academic year. |