EdPsy 399OL Fall
2001
Kim Fitzer
Tom Anderson, Instructor
Lesson 3 Question 1
Punishment-Required
I do not believe that
punishment is an effective way to control behavior in a classroom, or anywhere
else, for that matter. Barbara Coloroso, whose “Inner Discipline” behavior management plan
is based on trust and responsibility between teachers
and students, defines punishment “as treatment that is psychologically hurtful
to students and likely to provoke anger, resentment and additional conflict
(Charles, 2002).” I could not agree
more. Using punishment rather than
discipline will surely have a negative outcome, and ensure that the
relationship between teacher and student will deteriorate even more. Even using negative consequences to gain
control, except in the most extreme discipline problems, may
only serve to temporarily abate the behavior.
As some behaviorists point out, punishing a student for misbehavior has
a low probability of being successful because it does not replace the
inappropriate behavior with an acceptable alternative (Sprick,
1985). I do not use punishment, I rarely
write referrals or give detentions, and I do not experience behavior problems
in my classroom. When they arise, and
they do, usually at the beginning of the school year, I deal with them swiftly
and firmly, and the behavior problem seems to vanish. My methods involve positive reinforcement,
and direct, clear interactions with my students. It works, and the following illustrates why.
Almost instantly, students stop what they are doing and look up, eager
to have their name mentioned . I will continue to mention three or four more
names of students that have stopped and are looking directly at me,, particularly those that are chronically inattentive. When I have their attention, I thank them for
their swift attentiveness, and then begin my announcement. I also recognize those students that are
working on task, using good organization skills, and so on. While I do not agree with all of Canter’s
beliefs, I do use positive reinforcement
because it works.
C.
Deal with
misbehavior swiftly, firmly, consistently and privately. C. M. Charles, the author of the book Building Classroom Discipline,
proposes that it is often helpful to deal with misbehavior by identifying its
causes. I will often ask to speak to a
student privately, and state that the behavior the student is exhibiting needs
to cease (talking, tardies, off-task, etc.). I then ask the student to explain why this
behavior is not appropriate, and whether there is a reason for the problem. I do not raise my voice, yet I look directly
into the student’s face. Maintaining eye
contact is, I believe, important for good communication. We will come to an agreement at this point of
how to solve the problem, and strategies for the solution. Also, I state the
consequences of choosing to disregard our chat, and what will happen next. I rarely have to take it to the next
level. More commonly, I end up using
positive reinforcement the next time the student does behave appropriately.
This encourages the student to repeat the behavior, and thus, a new behavior is
learned.
D.
Give sincere
attention for good work, a job well done, a difficult task mastered. Communicating high expectations and
encouragement for
successful academic performance goes a long way towards minimizing classroom
discipline problems. Students may quit
trying or working if they feel their efforts are not appreciated, or are
futile, and resort to off-task, disruptive behavior (McDaniel, 1991). I find that when students feel that they are
successful, enjoy their assignments, and receive positive feedback, they
respond with enthusiasm, cheerful attitudes, and will work hard. William Glasser
states that a teacher’s job is to help students see that quality work makes
them feel good about themselves (Charles, 2002). As students begin to achieve success and
authentic praise from teachers and peers, their sense of self-esteem and
positive self-image emerges. This is a
desirable emotion and one that stimulates self-motivation. There is no need for rewards, incentive
programs, consequences or punishment.
Students do well because it feels good!
Of
course, I will admit that the kids I teach are generally very
well behaved, respectful, and academically motivated. Their parents are affluent, highly educated
professionals and have extremely high expectations. The kids come to us already instilled with a
rock solid foundation of values, and are among the most highly principled young
people I have ever met. Yet, any
student, no matter how well-behaved, will stray from the path of righteous
behavior from time to time, and if not steered back, may continue to test the
limits of what is allowable and what is not.
And I certainly do have students who are in
need of rigorous discipline plans, regular monitoring, and a “very short
leash.” However, I am convinced that the
four techniques I use in the classroom minimize the problems that I could have,
and allow me to concentrate on what is really important: teaching.
And not once do I have to resort to punishment.
References
Charles, C.M. 1999. Building Classroom Discipline.
McDaniel, Thomas
R. 1991. The
Motivating Teacher. Published in Teaching for Excellence, vol. XI, Number 2.
Sprick, Randall S. 1985. Discipline
in the Secondary Classroom: A
Problem-by-Problem Survival Guide.
West Nyack, N.Y. The Center for
Applied Research in Education.