| Anne Catey
Cumberland High School Toledo, IL 62428 acatey@hotmail.com |
University of Illinois
Curriculum Technology Education Reform EdPsy 490 ASA Instructor: Sandy Levin |
| For my project, I plan to restructure one of the units for my tech
prep English class, a senior level class with 13 students on the roster.
Typically, the students who enroll in this class are those who plan to
go directly into the workforce. These students traditionally respond
to hands-on projects rather than paper/pen tests.
The unit I would like to adjust is one that covers the employment process. In the past I have taught the students how to write a resume and a cover letter. For their assessment I normally have given them a paper/pen test along with grading their resumes and cover letters. However, I have never been satisfied with the results of this unit. I don't feel like it is "real" enough. Therefore, I would like to make it more "real" for the students by making it more of a project-based assessment rather than a paper/pen assessment. I want to expand the unit, bringing in the entire employment process (reading the want ads; completing applications; writing and sending resumes, cover letters and follow-up letters; and preparing and completing interviews). I hope to involve the community in this project. I plan to ask local businesses to provide a manager to complete mock interviews with the students. I also want to have the local businesses provide suggestions to the students regarding improvement of interviewing techniques. I will also ask the professionals to provide tips to the students regarding beginning a new job. I hope to incorporate different forms of assessment throughout the unit. As an English teacher, I feel it is extremely important to have the students reflect on their experiences through writing. However, instead of the traditional essay question at the end of an objective test, I plan to use different types of assessments along the way. The students will write reflection papers about their experiences and what they have learned. In addition, they will write technically when completing the resume and different types of letters that are associated with employment. They will also be assessed on how well they prepare for an interview as well as their performance in an interview. There will be other smaller assessments throughout the unit as well. These types of assessments are in sharp contrast to the one I previously used through this unit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: December 21, 2002
Red text and blue
links
indicate the assessments that have been modified.
All assessments can be easily adapted according
to the IEP of every special education student. Special education students
tend to do well on this unit because they are motivated by realism.
At this time, none of the students enrolled in this class has an
IEP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communication 2000: Module 6 (Lessons
1-12)
ECOS Web site - Preparation for choosing a career to research and pursue. - Module 6: Lesson 15 (Research a Career) |
- Explore career possibilities
- Choose and research a career. - Write a 2-3 page paper covering the questions in Module 6: Lesson 15 (page 165). |
- ECOS Career Assessment (http://ecos.princetonreview.com)
- Previous Career Research and Employment
Unit Assessment
- Career
Research Paper (Rubric)
|
-Possible job shadowing by 2003-2004. | 1.B.5a; 1.C.5c;
3.A.5;3.B.5;3.C.5a; 3.C.5b;4.A.5a;4.A.5b; 4.B.5a; 4.B.5c;4.B.5d; 5.B.5a; |
|
|
- Communication 2000: Module 6
(Lessons 12-15) - ECOS Web site - Newspapers - Technical Writing for Success - Computer lab and instruction |
Job Application
- Read Want Ads - Complete applications (at least one online application via ECOS). - Resume writing. - Send resume and cover letter w/envelope Interview Preparation - Research prospective companies - Complete questionnaire about their chosen company. Write a 1-page summary of the company. |
- Application
for Employment (Rubric)
- Resume (Rubric) - Letter of Application (Rubric) Interview Preparation - Compile list of possible interview questions. - Research summary of prospective company (Rubric) |
Job Application and Interview Preparation
Contact businesses:
|
Job Application
1B5a; 1C5b; 1D5d 3A5; 3B5; 3C5b 3A5; 3B5; 3C5b 3A5; 3B5; 3C5b Interview Preparation 5A5a;5A5b |
|
|
- Communication 2000
- ECOS Web site - Newspapers - Technical Writing for Success - Computer lab and instruction |
Interview Techniques
- Body Language - Typical questions Follow-up
|
Interview Techniques
- Quiz over gestures - Rubric for mock interview w/teacher and/or mock interview w/ community businesses Follow-up
- Thank you letters to community members (for their participation in the unit). Final Assessment
|
Interview Techniques
- Possibly go to company for interview -Possible job shadowing in 2003-2004 |
Interview Techniques
1. 4A5a; 4A5b; 4B5a; 4B5c 2.4B5c Follow-up
Final Assessment
|
| For my project, I decided to restructure the unit that covers the employment
process in my tech prep English class, a senior level class with 13 students
on the roster. Typically, the students who enroll in this class are
those who plan to go directly into the workforce. These students
traditionally respond to hands-on projects rather than paper/pen tests.
In the past I have taught the students how to write a resume and a cover letter. For their assessment I gave them an objective test and graded their resumes and cover letters without the use of rubrics. This simply was just another unit to them. They did not internalize it. I have never been satisfied with the results of this unit. I don't feel that it is "real" enough. These students were going to hit the “real” world in less than a year and needed to realize what the employment process was all about. Therefore, the purpose of modifying this unit was to make it more "real" for the students. So, I expanded the unit, bringing in the entire employment process and making it more of a project-based assessment. Last year, I had the students write a resume, a letter of application, a follow-up letter, and a career research paper on any career in which they were interested (in that order). I graded these individually. Then, the students turned in all of them again at the end of the unit for what I called a “portfolio” grade. Obviously, this was weak. I didn’t know a lot about portfolios at the time. There were several changes that needed to be made if the students were going to internalize this. Now, knowing more about portfolios, I have made some necessary changes. One change was that of rearranging the order of completion of the different parts of the portfolio assessment. Also, I added several sections to the unit in order to make it more “real” for the students. The best change was moving the research paper from the last assignment
completed to the first assignment completed. This gives the students
a better idea of the possibilities within their chosen field. This
can help focus them throughout the rest of the employment process.
Other changes made involved not only restructuring but also adding needed
sections. Now, the unit consists of
Also, the students must also save their portfolio in their network file
and place it on a back up disk for future use.
Overview of All Assessments Modified Since this has changed from a 2-week unit into a semester project, many of the assessments have changed. Since some new sections were added to the unit, assessments for those sections were added. Those include assessments for the application for employment, the interview, and the reflection papers on the value of each part of the portfolio. While new assessments were added, the existing ones were modified. Those assessments include the ones for the resume, the letter of application, the follow-up letter, the career research paper, and the portfolio assessment. The modified rubrics cover concepts specific to each activity. Last year, the assessment for all the written material was the same; all mistakes were counted and lumped into one combined grade. Using this method made it difficult to relate the mistakes to the area needing improvement. In other words, the results were not pointing to anything specific. Now, using the individualized rubrics I have designed, we can identify each student’s areas of weakness and improve upon them. This allows the focus to be placed on the concepts and the learning outcomes. Focus on Career Research Assessment This brings me to the focus of my project. The assessment for the career research paper was in need of some modification. Last year, it was graded just like every other written assignment already mentioned. I felt more emphasis should be placed on the content. So, I started at the beginning – the assignment. Last year, I simply told the students to research a career in which they were interested and put whatever they thought was important about it in their paper. Obviously, these directions were way too vague. So, I started by making
the directions more precise, moving from less focused to more focused.
To help the students, I gave them 6 different sections to research.
They were to find
Adding these specific objectives to the directions resulted in much
more specific research papers. In the end, better directions led
to better results.
What I Have Learned Overall. After using the specific rubric to grade the research paper, I realized the many changes that took place. Personally, using the rubric reduces my grading time. That’s always a plus in any teacher’s book. As for the students, they were able to focus on the content more. This led some of them to realize what is expected of them in regards to their chosen career. As a result of their focus on content, some are even more interested in the field they chose and expressed an interest in continuing their education at a local junior college before hitting the workforce. That is a big change in attitude. Before this unit, many of them simply wanted to graduate and start working. Now, several have expressed a desire to attend college first so they can meet the requirements for advancement in their career field. This is evidence that the research paid off and the goal of making the unit more “real” for them has been achieved. A brief case study proves that this focus on content and unit expansion has been successful. A boy in my class began the unit with absolutely no idea as to what he was going to do after graduation. He had no focus and no direction. It was a joke to him at first, but then it became very real to him and he was honestly worried about his future. After taking the career assessment on the ECOS Web site and a few days of “surfing the Net”, he began to focus on the area of law enforcement. By the end of the research unit, he handed in his paper and said with conviction and confidence, “Mrs. Catey, I’m going to be a cop!” He was truly excited about his future, asking about the classes offered at the local junior college. I have learned several different things throughout this project.
First, I will focus on the positive aspects of this unit.
As we all know, nothing is perfect. Unfortunately, I have hit
some stumbling
The rubrics have been very successful. However, like everything else, there is always room for improvement. For instance, the career research paper rubric is very thorough. However, I realized after using it, that I forgot to add a section about the salary of the chosen career. This is an important part of the research; therefore, I will add it for next year. As for the portfolio assessment, I will continue to work on that this year and look for ways to improve it until it is time to use it. Right now, I plan to adapt Jill McCue’s “Student Responses to Biology Portfolio” to my unit. I am impressed with that reflection form, especially how she included a place for the parents to comment. There are questions on the form that require parent/student interaction in order to answer them. I think that is a great way to invite the parents into their son’s or daughter’s education and produces good public relations. Hopefully, in the future I will be able to implement job-shadowing. My current students have a big interest in this, so I will continue to work on setting this up for them. I am trying to set it up as an individual field trip day so the students won’t have to take a prearrange absence in order to participate. Since it is for a class, I feel they should get credit for attendance. This request will be tough to get approved; however, I will keep trying because I feel this is an excellent way to get an early idea of what a particular job or career is like. Other future additions to the unit could involve technology. I’m hoping to add applying on-line for a job. However, there is a big roadblock for this idea. I must first get emailing permission from the administration. This, I’m afraid, will never happen because our district is actually tightening up the restrictions within the next few weeks. So, I’m afraid emailing privileges are out of the question. Another addition that will take place is that the students will possibly do a Power Point presentation at the end of the unit. I feel this would be a good replacement for the objective test which is used as a final test. All in all, I am excited about the changes that have been made
in this unit. Also, I am motivate to continue modifying the unit
in order to make it more lifelike for my students.
|